VIP SECURITY COVER
In many countries, including India, VIP security cover has become a symbol of supremacy and privilege. Often provided to politicians, celebrities, and other high-profile individuals, these security arrangements involve the deployment of armed guards and other measures to protect the VIPs. While the provision of security to VIPs is understandable in certain circumstances, such as when there are genuine threats to their safety, the widespread use of VIP security covers as a symbol of status and power is concerning. It suggests that certain individuals are considered more important than others and that their safety and security are more valuable than that of the general population. In India, the government deploys a set number of security professionals to ensure the safety of high-risk individuals and designated VVIPs alike. The Central and State Governments have established requirements for the supply of one or two security professionals under the cover of VIP security, ranging from the Prime Minister’s SPG security cover to Z-plus, Z, Y-plus, Y, and X-category security. VIP protection is the responsibility of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) and the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). One of the main problems with VIP security cover is that it creates a sense of separation between the protected elites and the general public. With armed guards and other security measures in place, VIPs are insulated from the everyday dangers and risks faced by the rest of society. This separation only serves to further reinforce the power dynamics between the protected elites and the rest of the population, and it can lead to a sense of entitlement and superiority among those who receive security cover.
In addition to creating a sense of separation, VIP security cover also consumes a large amount of resources that could be used to benefit the general public. The deployment of armed guards, the use of vehicles and other equipment, and the maintenance of security infrastructure all come at a cost, and these resources could be better used elsewhere. For example, they could be used to improve public safety, fund education, and healthcare, or provide other benefits to the general population. Another problem with VIP security cover is that it can create a false sense of security among those who receive it. With armed guards and other measures in place, VIPs may feel protected from all potential threats, leading them to underestimate the risks they face. This can result in complacency and a lack of caution, which can ultimately lead to accidents or other incidents that could have been avoided.
Overall, the widespread use of VIP security covers as a symbol of supremacy is a concern. It reinforces power dynamics and separation between the protected elites and the general population, consumes resources that could be better used elsewhere, and can create a false sense of security among those who receive it. Instead of providing security cover as a symbol of status and power, it would be more beneficial to focus on improving the safety and security of the general population through measures such as community policing, public education, and other proactive measures. By doing so, we can create a more equitable and inclusive society where everyone is valued and protected. Moreover, these VIPs are not above the law and hence, they have no right to make others’ life miserable just for their own sake.
